Videos on this page shows examples of Incompetent, Partisan Judges Appointed by Trump & Republicans

A Trump-appointed judge granted Donald Trump’s special master request, thereby delaying parts of the Justice Department’s criminal probe. “When you allow Republicans to control the courts you get nothing,” legal expert Elie Mystal says to Joy Reid, adding his view that, “Trump judges do not believe in the rule of law.”

Trump’s Crony Judge is MAKING A MOCKERY of the Rule of Law

Jesse discusses the bananas ruling of Trump-appointed judge Aileen Cannon related to several matters regarding the Mar-a-Lago search and retrieval of top secret and highly sensitive national security intelligence. Scholars and legal experts are sounding off all over the country about how bad this judge’s rulings have been and what a rank amateur she is.

With each action she takes, it is harder and harder to conclude anything other than Judge Cannon is fully biased in favor of the man that got her her job, Donald Trump. It’s an important reminder, that in the end, the judiciary and the law is ultimately just what a bunch of judges say it is.”

Trump’s History Of Seeking Out ‘His’ Judges Continues With Mar-a-Lago Case

Chris Hayes on Judge Aileen Cannon’s absurd ruling to grant Trump a special master: “The ex-president has made it very clear that he believes judges he appoints should work on his behalf, rather than on behalf of the law.

Judge Aileen Cannon Removed from case by Eleventh Circuit Court!

A three-judge 11th Circuit Court of Appeals panel issued a scathing rejection of U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon’s decision to have a special master review records seized from Mar-a-Lago, another defeat for Donald Trump in a week of legal defeats.

Right Wing Federal Appeals Judges make HORRIFIC and DANGEROUS Ruling

Michael Popok of Legal AF reports on a new 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling striking down as unconstitutional under the 2nd Amendment the 30-year federal ban on subjects of domestic violence restraining orders from possessing a firearm.

Trump Picks More ‘Not Qualified’ Judges (1)

More of Donald Trump’s judicial picks have received “not qualified” ratings from the American Bar Association than did those nominated by his four most-recent predecessors in the first two years of their presidencies, Bloomberg Law research shows.

The Republican Senate has confirmed 30 of Trump’s appellate nominees, two U.S. Supreme Court justices, and 53 district court judges. Details above

Everyone of these Unqualified Judges were approved by Republicans on the Judiciary Committee, proving ALL are incompetent and unfit to hold public office.

‘Not Qualified’ Trump Judge Voids Mask Mandate

Description from Youtube / MSNBC “Judge who was rated unqualified to be a judge has the sole power to loosely or narrowly interpret the word ‘sanitation,’ and change the rules for hundreds of millions of Americans.”

Why Are Unqualified Judges Making Decisions For The Nation?

A Trump-appointed judge who was deemed unqualified by the Bar Association struck down a national mask mandate for public transportation.

What to know about Judge Kathryn Mizelle, who struck down the travel mask mandate

Mizelle was nominated by former President Donald Trump in 2020 at age 33. The American Bar Association said at the time she wasn’t qualified because she hadn’t been practicing law for long enough.

Criticized for Lacking Professional Experience

Per the article above: “U.S. District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle struck down the federal mask mandate for airplanes and other modes of public transportation Monday, writing in a 59-page ruling that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had exceeded its authority and failed to follow proper rulemaking procedures.

That decision, which led to U.S. airlines and other transportation hubs to promptly drop their mask mandates, has elicited mixed responses from travelers and concern from experts.

The ABA recommends that nominees for federal judgeships have at least 12 years of experience practicing law — whereas Mizelle was nominated for her current position only eight years after passing the bar.

In a letter to the leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the head of the ABA Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary said that a majority of his group had deemed that Mizelle did “not meet the requisite minimum standard of experience necessary to perform the responsibilities required by the high office of a federal trial judge.”

Trump-appointed judge voiding travel mask mandate raises danger of Covid surge experts say’

Trump-appointed judge’s ruling just voided the mask mandate on planes. Her decision ignores or distorts the opinion of most medical experts and raises the danger of a surge in Covid-19 cases

Poll: Majority Of Americans Still Support Mask Mandate

“This Trump-appointed judge has brought us right back to the Trump years when we had a tyranny of the minority,” says Ayman Mohyeldin. “A minority of Americans voted for Trump, a minority approved of his mishandling of the pandemic, and a minority support dropping masks on public transport.”

Trump nominee for federal judge has never tried a case

Trump nominated Brett J. Talley, a 36 year old blogger who has practiced law for three years, has never tried a case and who thinks Hillary Clinton should be Jailed, for a lifetime appointment on the Federal Bench.

Trump Judicial pick can’t answer basic law questions

Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) questions Matthew Spencer Petersen, President Trump’s nominee for district court judge about his lack of experience trying cases in court. Cenk Uygur, the host of The Young Turks, breaks down the video.

Trump Nominates Anti-LGBTQ Extremist Jeff Mateer

Jeff Mateer, Trump’s nominee for a federal judgeship in Texas, believes that transgender children are evidence of “Satan’s plan,” supports the dangerous and debunked practice of so-called “conversion therapy,” and thinks marriage equality will lead to bestiality.

Republicans Confirm Trump Judicial Pick, Lawrence VanDyke
Rated ‘Not Qualified’ For Being ‘Lazy,’ ‘Arrogant’

The American Bar Association took the rare step of rating VanDyke as “unqualified,” noting colleagues of his who were interviewed consistently gave this description: “arrogant, lazy, an ideologue and lacking in knowledge of the day-to-day practice, including procedural rules. There was a theme that the nominee lacks humility, has an ‘entitlement’ temperament, does not have an open mind, and does not always have a commitment to being candid and truthful.” Furthermore, they were concerned “about whether Mr. VanDyke would be fair to persons who are gay, lesbian or otherwise part of the LGBTQ community.”

VanDyke has a long history of extremist anti-LGBTQ rhetoric and actions. As a student at Harvard Law School, he wrote an op-ed claiming same-sex marriage would “hurt families and consequentially children and society.” At his hearing, VanDyke was provided with an opportunity to address his previous statements regarding same-sex marriage, specifically as to whether same-sex marriage damaged children. He pointedly refused to answer. VanDyke also refused to respond to Senators’ inquiries as to his legal approach to the intersection of LGBTQ rights and religious liberty. Emails from him reveal a Solicitor General who had little interest in engaging in the daily tasks of the office and instead an ideologue committed to advancing a political agenda.

Trump Nominates Anti-LGBTQ Extremist Jeff Mateer

Jeff Mateer, Trump’s nominee for a federal judgeship in Texas, believes that transgender children are evidence of “Satan’s plan,” supports the dangerous and debunked practice of so-called “conversion therapy,” and thinks marriage equality will lead to bestiality.

Conservative Right-Wing Extremist Amy Coney Barrett proves to be totally unfit to be a Judge in ANY Court, let alone the United States Supreme Court by being unable to answer the most basic legal and constitutional questions.

Amy Coney Barrett can’t name five freedoms in the First Amendment

Amy Coney Barrett Unable to Answer Easy Question About First Amendment

Jesse addresses a few moments from the Senate confirmation hearings of Judge Amy Coney Barrett who is Donald Trump’s unqualified nominee for Supreme Court Justice to replace the beloved late Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

DARK MONEY CONTROL OVER SUPREME COURT

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse gives outstanding presentation how Big Business “Dark Money” has been playing a role in the Supreme Court nomination process.

As tweeted by Matt O’Brien (Formerly with the Washington Post & the Atlantic) on Oct 26, 2020… “Nothing says “I will be an impartial judge in any election-related cases” like showing up at a rally with one of the litigants”

Amy Coney Barrett is a far-right, activist judge threatens to upend the lives of millions of Americans

Amy Coney Barrett refused to say that the Supreme Court decision that protects access to birth control was rightly decided. When past Republican and Democratic-appointed nominees were asked the same question, their answers were very clear. What does Barrett have to hide?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election-2020/amy-coney-barrett-supreme-court-prison-case-rape-damages-b1109734.html

Per the above article; “Ms Barrett was reportedly one of three appellate judges who reversed a 2018 $6.7 million ruling against a Wisconsin county that ran the prison.

Milwaukee County was hit with the damages after one of their corrections officers was charged with repeatedly raping the 19-year-old inmate before and after her pregnancy.

Former prison guard Xavier Thicklen was charged with multiple counts of sexual assault in 2013, but they were dropped when he pleaded guilty to felony misconduct in public office.

“After a 19-year old pregnant prison inmate was repeatedly raped by a prison guard, Amy Coney Barrett ruled that the county responsible for the prison could not be held liable because the sexual assaults fell outside of the guard’s official duties,” Kyle Herrig, president of the progressive watchdog group Accountable.US, told Salon.com.

“Her judgment demonstrates a level of unconscionable cruelty that has no place on the high court.

“The only thing more concerning than the rush to confirm by Senate Republicans is what we are learning about Amy Coney Barrett’s extremist record”.

Religious group scrubs all references to Amy Coney Barrett from its website

People of Praise, a tiny charismatic Catholic organization, admits removing mentions and photos of Trump’s supreme court pick

Per the above article: “A religious organization tied to Amy Coney Barrett, Donald Trump’s supreme court nominee, sought to erase all mentions and photos of her from its website before she meets with lawmakers and faces questions at her Senate confirmation hearings. Barrett, a federal appeals judge, has declined to publicly discuss her decades-long affiliation with People of Praise, a Christian group that opposes abortion and holds that men are divinely ordained as the “head” of the family and faith.

Former members have said the group’s leaders teach that wives must submit to the will of their husbands. After an AP reporter emailed the group’s spokesman on Wednesday about members of Jesse Barrett’s family, his mother’s name was deleted from the primary contact for the South Bend, Indiana, branch. All issues of the organization’s magazine, Vine and Branches, were also removed.

The AP was able to track the deletions and access the missing information through the Internet Archive, a non-profit group that has saved digital versions of more than 330bn web pages since 1996. Barrett, 48, did not mention People of Praise in her 2017 or 2020 Senate judicial vetting questionnaires, the most recent of which was released on Tuesday. And a request to interview her made through the seventh circuit court of appeals in Chicago, where she currently serves as a judge, was declined”.

A former member of the secretive Catholic group People of Praise, known for its rigid gender roles and lifelong loyalty oaths, which apparent front-runner Judge Amy Coney Barrett is a member of is now speaking out against the organization. “Many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult,” says Coral Anika Theill, who was a member of People of Praise from 1979 to 1984.

Per info about Amy Barrett from demandjustice.org/stop-amy-coney-barrett;

Affordable Care Act

The Supreme Court is currently considering a case in which the justices could strike down the Affordable Care Act in its entirety, ending protections for Americans with preexisting conditions and kicking millions off their health insurance. Barrett has repeatedly signaled that she would support lawsuits to overturn the Affordable Care Act:

• Barrett criticized Chief Justice Roberts for his opinion in NFIB v. Sebelius , which upheld the ACA against a constitutional challenge, saying he “pushed the Affordable Care Act beyond its plausible meaning to save the statute.”
• In a 2015 NPR interview, Barrett expressed disagreement with the Supreme Court’s
  majority opinion in King v. Burwell, the second case in which the Court upheld the ACA, saying the dissent had “the better of the legal argument.”

Roe v. Wade

Barrett was the favorite choice of anti-choice activists because she has made clear that she does not respect the constitutional right to an abortion and would seek to overturn Roe v. Wade and curtail reproductive freedom.

• In a 2003 article, she suggested Roe v. Wade was an “erroneous decision.”
• In that article , Barrett wrote, “Courts and commentators have… thought about the kinds of reliance interests that justify keeping an erroneous decision on the books” — and the
  only decision she cited as an example of an “erroneous decision” was the Planned Parenthood v. Casey Supreme Court decision that specifically reaffirmed Roe v. Wade .
• In another article, Barrett gave examples of “cases that no justice would overrule, even if she disagrees with the interpretive premises from which precedent proceeds”—but did not list Roe .
• In 2018, the U.S.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit struck down an Indiana law that would have prohibited abortions at any time during a pregnancy based on the reason
  a person is seeking an abortion. The court held that the law “ clearly violate[d] well-established Supreme Court precedent .” Barrett went on record saying she disagreed with the court’s ruling and strongly suggesting that the law was, in fact, constitutional.
• In 2019, the Seventh Circuit struck down another blatantly unconstitutional law which would have required anyone under 18 to notify their parents prior to receiving an abortion, without exception. Barrett would have allowed the law to go into effect .
• She was a member of Notre Dame University’s anti-abortion Faculty for Life.
• Sen. Josh Hawley said that he would only vote for justices who have said that Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided and that Barrett “meets that standard.”
• Barrett signed an open letter that criticized the Affordable Care Act’s birth control benefit as an “assault on religious liberty” and referred to common birth control methods as
  “abortion-drugs” and “embryo-destroying ‘five day after pill.’”

Workers’ Rights

• Barrett has a troubling track record of siding with companies that engage in discrimination. Her record raises serious questions about how she would approach workers’ rights and civil rights issues on the bench.
• Barrett has ruled for corporations over people 76% of the time.
• Barrett upheld a ruling that allowed a company to “intentionally assign members of different races to [work at] different stores.” In a dissent, one judge called it a
  “separate-but-equal arrangement” and said it was “contrary to the position that the Supreme Court has taken in analogous equal protection cases as far back as Brown v. Board of Education.”
• Barrett ruled that a company had not engaged in illegal age discrimination by having a maximum number of years of experience for a job posting, even though the requirement
  severely disadvantaged older workers.
• Barrett dismissed a case brought by two employees against an employer who they claimed improperly fired them. The employees attempted to utilize the employers’ arbitration process, but eventually sued in court because the process had been stalled for years. Barrett’s dismissal kicked the employees out of federal court.

Gun Safety

Barrett’s record raises serious concerns about how she would approach gun safety laws. Last year, she dissented from a decision upholding a longstanding federal law that banned people who
had been convicted of felonies from possessing firearms, suggesting she takes a radical view on gun safety that could also lead her to strike down other, common-sense gun safety measures.

Immigrant Justice

Barrett has repeatedly ruled against the rights of immigrants, siding with the Trump administration on its public charge rule and repeatedly voting for overly harsh interpretations of immigration law.

• Barrett voted to let the Trump administration impose a so-called “public charge” rule that would have prevented immigrants from receiving legal permanent residence status if they had availed themselves of certain public benefits to which, by law, they were entitled. The Trump rule vastly expanded the definition of “public charge,” thereby expanding the universe of immigrants who were deemed ineligible for legal permanent residence.
• Barrett wrote the majority opinion rejecting an El Salvadoran immigrant’s request for protection from deportation. Though the immigrant in the case fled to the U.S. because he was the target of gang violence in his home country, his request for protection was rejected based on what the dissent described as “minor” and “trivial” inconsistencies in his testimony.
• Barrett wrote an opinion dismissing the case of a U.S. citizen who claimed his due process rights were violated when a consular official denied his spouse a visa based on unsubstantiated and contradicted allegations of wrongdoing.
• Barrett cast the deciding vote to allow for the immediate deportation of a legal permanent resident who had lived in the United States for over thirty years but who became deportable
  simply because of an arcane, and since-repealed, federal law that treats children of naturalized mothers and children of mothers who are citizens by birth differently.

LGBTQ+ Rights

Barrett’s track record suggests she could be on the side of reversing decades of progress when it comes to LGBTQ+ rights, a fact made all the more troubling by her stated willingness to disregard precedent when it conflicts with her own analysis.

• She has defended the Supreme Court’s dissenters on the landmark marriage equality case of Obergefell v. Hodges, questioning the role of the court in deciding the case.
• She has said Title IX protections do not extend to transgender Americans , claiming it’s a “strain on the text” to reach that interpretation.
• She has misgendered transgender people, referring to a transgender women as “physiological males,” while casting doubt on transgender rights.
• She has been paid $4200 for addressing a legal group affiliated with Alliance Defending Freedom , a group that advocates have called “arguably the most extreme anti-LGBT
  legal organization in the United States.”

Partisan Ties

Barrett has been a loyal footsoldier in the Republican Party’s attempts to subvert the democratic process in the interest of partisanship, working on the Bush v. Gore case and defending Republicans’ choice not to fill a Supreme Court vacancy during President Obama’s term in office.

• Barrett started her legal career working to win the 2000 presidential election for George W. Bush . She describes Bush v. Gore as one of the most significant legal activities she has pursued. She even spent time in Florida researching and briefing the case.
• Trump promised before his election in 2016 that his judges would all be “ picked by the Federalist Society .” Barrett was a member of the Federalist Society from 2005 to 2006 and rejoined the group in 2014, citing “the opportunity to speak to groups of interested, engaged students on topics of mutual interest.” A mere three years later, she was nominated by President Trump to serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and within eleven months, she was added to Trump’s Supreme Court shortlist.
• In 2016, Barrett took to the airwaves to defend the Republican Party’s unprecedented decision to block President Obama from choosing a replacement for the late Justice Antonin Scalia. After tersely reviewing the history of election-year Supreme Court nominations, distinguishing each example that failed to support the GOP’s position, she concluded that “the president has the power to nominate and the Senate has the power to act or not.”

Substituting Her Own Views Over Binding

Barrett’s radical views are all the more dangerous because she has made clear she would not be bound by the traditional principle that Supreme Court justices should defer to precedent set by past Supreme Court decisions. Barrett would be a dangerous Supreme Court justice because she would substitute her own views for long-standing law.

• Barrett wrote that Supreme Court justices should not follow precedent they disagree with, but instead have “a duty” to substitute their own “best understanding” of the Constitution.
• The Los Angeles Times noted that Barrett has been “unusually frank in her support for overturning precedents that are not in line with the Constitution.”

Supreme Court nominee served as ‘handmaid’ in religious group

Amy Coney Barrett was a high-ranking female leader in the People of Praise religious community.

Per the above article: “Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett served as a “handmaid,” the term then used for high-ranking female leaders in the People of Praise religious community, an old directory for the group’s members shows. Barrett has thus far refused to discuss her membership in the Christian organization, which opposes abortion and, according to former members, holds that men are divinely ordained as the “head” of both the family and faith, while it is the duty of wives to submit to them”.

Republicans have hijacked the highest court in the land. First, they stole a Supreme Court seat from President Obama. Then, they changed a 70-year old rule to install two of Donald Trump’s far-right justices and confirmed Brett Kavanaugh despite credible allegations that he committed sexual assault and lied under oath.

Now, the politicized Supreme Court is enacting a far-right, partisan agenda that favors corporate interests and Republican Party special interests. Reproductive freedom, civil rights, environmental justice, common sense gun safety laws, and our right to vote are all at risk. And the Court is eroding confidence in our system of government with ethical lapses and lack of transparency.

We need a Supreme Court that can be trusted to be fair, nonpolitical, and ethical. We need to reform the Supreme Court.

Amy Barrett being submitted for consideration of being a Supreme Court Judge within days of the passing of Ruth Ginsburg and within weeks of the 2020 election when Republicans BLOCKED President Obama’s nominee during the last year of his Presidency is an outrage.

• The MAJORITY voted for Al Gore in 2000 by over 500,000 votes yet George W. Bush was crammed down the American Majority’s Throats. The election was STOLEN by the Electoral College, PLUS Florida Republicans illegally purged thousands of minorities off voters rolls and vote counting was stopped by the Republican Majority Supreme Court. The installation of George W. Bush caused the deaths of thousands of Americans and Iraqis due to the misguided and unjustified war with Iraq. Trillions was added to the National Debt due to George W. Bush’s incompetence.
• Bush appointed 2 Justices against the will of the MAJORITY = 2 Supreme Court Seats Stolen
• Republicans STOLE a 3rd Supreme Court Seat from the American Majority by blocking President Obama’s Supreme Court appointment stating “The people should decide” during an election year.
• The MAJORITY voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016 by over 2.89 Million votes yet Donald Trump was crammed down the American Majority’s Throats. The election was once again STOLEN by the Electoral College which made the LOSER the “winner”.
• Trump filled Obama’s Supreme Court Seat, plus a 4th Supreme Court Seat against the Will of the Majority
• After Ruth Ginsburg died Republicans proved to be PARTISAN HYPOCRITES by committing to fill her seat weeks before the 2020 election with Conservative Supreme Court nominee Amy Barrett who is being appointed SOLELY because she’s expected to rule on issues like Roe V. Wade & “Affordable Healthcare” a certain way
• Appointing & confirming “Justices” because they are expected to rule on issues a particular way is not justice… it’s a BANANA REPUBLIC RIGGED KANGAROO COURT
• The Senate is RIGGED for Republicans and doesn’t represent the MAJORITY. Half of the US population lives in just nine states yet is only represented by 18 Senators. Democrats led Republicans by more than 12 million votes in Senate races in the 2018 election, yet suffered losses due to our UN-Democratic Rigged-for-Republicans Government
• The Supreme Court is now Rigged for Republicans and doesn’t represent the MAJORITY. It’s just another tool to cram unpopular conservative ideologies down the Majority’s Throats.
• Republicans are behaving like Fascist Authoritarians, who only care about power and cramming what they want down citizens throats, lacking decency, fairness, ethics and integrity
• The MAJORITY of Americans are NOT Conservative and does not support BACKWARD, REPRESSIVE, CONSERVATIVE, 1800’s ideologies and values
• The President SHOULD be elected by the MAJORITY
• The Supreme Court SHOULD represent the values and will of the MAJORITY.

Unearthed video from 2016 in a CBS News interview with Amy Coney Barrett shows her warning of Supreme Court appointments that “could dramatically flip the balance of power in the court.”

Judge Barrett has the approval of ultraconservative and anti-abortion groups, and her views are out of step with the majority of Americans, who overwhelmingly support access to safe, legal abortion care. Seventy-seven percent of people in this country believe the Supreme Court should uphold Roe v. Wade. We need a Supreme Court justice who will honor precedent, including Roe v. Wade.

Judge Neil Gorsuch Would Have Let this Trucker Die!

On a freezing night in January 2009, Alphonse Maddin was driving a truck with a load of meat through Illinois. The brakes on the trailer froze. The temperature was 27 degrees below zero. As he waited for help, he started having trouble breathing. His skin was cracking and his speech was slurring.

He called his employer. They told him to remain with the truck. Instead, he detached the trailer from the truck and drove to safety. For saving his own life, he was fired by the company. He sued the company and Gorsuch was the only judge who sided against the trucker.

Only One Judge Ruled Against Freezing Truck Driver… Trump’s.

Sen. Al Franken Grills Neil Gorsuch on Frozen Trucker Case in Extended Questioning

Senator Al Franken (D-MN) grilling Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch during his Supreme Court confirmation hearing about the so-called frozen trucker case of Alphonse Maddin. Gorsuch ruled it was right

Father Testifies That Gorsuch’s Decision Against Autistic Children Tore His Family Apart

In this Majority Report clip, we watch a portion of Jeffrey Perkins—the father of an autistic child who was compelled to move his child to a private school in Boston because public schools could not meet his needs—testifying to the way that Neil Gorsuch’s 10th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion following the court’s decision to lower the federal standards to practically nothing for students with disabilities cost him a fortune and tore his family apart.

Neil Gorsuch is anti-women and anti-LGBT

Serious questions remain about whether Kavanaugh lied to the Senate. Under Republican direction, the Senate requested and reviewed only a small fraction of Kavanaugh’s records, and what it did receive was provided through a partisan Republican lawyer instead of by the nonpartisan professionals at the National Archives. The few documents that were made public show that Kavanaugh was less than forthcoming, and probably outright untruthful, on a number of issues. Leaked emails have been damning.

FBI Conducted ‘Fake’ Background Check on Brett Kavanaugh

Rachel Maddow reports on a letter from Senator Sheldon Whitehouse to newly confirmed Attorney General Merrick Garland, requesting the DOJ follow up on several unresolved matters from from the Trump era, including whether accusations against Brett Kavanaugh were properly investigated by the FBI

Sen. Blumenthal: Republicans Have Engaged In Kavanaugh ‘Cover Up’

Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh may have escaped the kind of scrutiny that was warranted for a SCOTUS judge during his confirmation, but that doesn’t mean that he’s off the hook. Calls of his impeachment became deafening this past weekend after new allegations came out in the form of a lengthy New York Times investigation. If these allegations are true, then Kavanaugh committed perjury during his confirmation and can be impeached.

New York Times reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly discuss the reporting in their new book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation” about the allegations of sexual misconduct that came out during the confirmation hearing of now-Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Aired on 09/16/19.

Ret. Justice John Stevens: Kavanaugh Disqualified Himself From Supreme Court

John Paul Stevens, one of the only living retired Supreme Court justices, believes that Brett Kavanaugh’s emotional, angry testimony disqualified him from being able to serve effectively on the Court.

Kavanaugh behaved in a UNHINGED, BELLIGERENT, DEFIANT, COMBATIVE, ARGUMENTATIVE and DISRESPECTFUL manner at the Senate Hearing on September 27, 2018.

When asked questions about drinking, would then throw the questions back at the Senator, demanding they answer HIS questions. Kavanaugh has proved he doesn’t have the temperament to be Supreme Court Justice and is UNFIT for any position in government.

The above video shows examples of Brett Kavanaugh LYING yet Lindsey Graham & most Republicans are standing by and defending this Unfit Nominee for the Supreme Court.

At Tuesday’s Supreme Court confirmation hearing, Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy accused President Donald Trump’s nominee Brett Kavanaugh of providing misleading testimony about his time with the Bush administration.

Watch Kavanaugh Blatantly LIE To Prosecutor

The amount of things Brett Kavanaugh got away with during his hearing is stunning.

Old Kavanaugh speech exposes His Privilege and his blatant HYPOCRISY

SCOTUS Nominee Brett Kavanaugh Is A Corrupt Corporatist

Brett Kavanaugh has had all sorts of unflattering information being revealed, some of which seems to implicate Kavanaugh in illegal activity. But one thing that has been missing is talk of his anti-consumer rulings on everything from protecting clean air to workplace protections, and those are the issues where Kavanaugh could really cause havoc if he gets confirmed. Ring of Fire’s Farron Cousins explains why Kavanaugh must be stopped from getting a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh Sided with SeaWorld After Trainer Was Drowned By Whale

After a SeaWorld trainer was drowned by a killer whale in 2010, Judge Kavanaugh said the company was immune from penalty. Kavanaugh has proven to be a Corrupt Corporatist who rules against consumers and 87% of the time in favor of Corporations.

Cover-Up of Brett Kavanaugh’s Records

The man who vetted Obama’s Supreme Court picks says there’s a massive data cover-up to make sure Brett Kavanaugh slithers his way into a nomination.

Kavanaugh’s past statement on Nixon

KAVANAUGH IS OPPOSED BY THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS AND IS THE MOST UNPOPULAR SUPREME COURT JUSTICE NOMINEE IN HISTORY

U.S. Women Reject Donald Trump SCOTUS Pick Brett Kavanaugh

Rachel Maddow outlines the historic depth of the unpopularity of Donald Trump’s pick for Supreme Court, Brett Kavanaugh, and and unearths audio of Kavanaugh looking for legalistic excuses to keep a 17-year-old pregnant immigrant from exercising her constitutional right to an abortion.

Woman accuses Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct

A woman says Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh assaulted her when they were both in high school, according to a source familiar with the allegation

Drink,teenage sex and a stripper: Brett Kavanaugh’s school years

Mark Judge (left), who is accused of helping Brett Kavanaugh (right) in a sex attack the nominee denies, described his time at Georgetown Prep, Bethesda, MD, books seen by DailyMail.com

EXCLUSIVE: ‘A school swimming in alcohol’, beach parties, sex and even a STRIPPER – inside Brett Kavanaugh’s elite education, by the friend accused of being part of ‘drunken sex attack’

• Brett Kavanaugh went to elite all-boys Catholic school Georgetown Prep in Bethesda, MD – and is now accused of attack on girl, 15, when he was there
• Professor who claims Kavanaugh attacked her said that his best friend Mark Judge was also present and helped, jumping on top of her too
• Christine Blasey Ford said it happened during drunken party when she was wearing bathing suit
• Now DailyMail.com has obtained both books written by Judge which detail what he says were drink-sodden high school years
• He writes about ‘popping’, the habit of holding parties when parents were away, which saw teenage sex and houses trashed
• Writes about ‘Bart O’Kavanaugh’ who had ‘puked’ in a car and also writes about a bachelor party for teacher for which students hired a stripper

Damning Clip of Brett Kavanaugh saying “What happened at Georgetown Prep STAYS at Georgetown Prep – and that’s a good thing”

Why Lisa Murkowski Opposes Brett Kavanaugh

https://www.thenation.com/article/brett-kavanaugh-should-be-impeached/

Brett Kavanaugh’s perjury does not just disqualify him from service on the US Supreme Court.. it disqualifies him from service as any kind of judge

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a22987419/brett-kavanaugh-republican-operative-george-bush/

Brett Kavanaugh Is a Lifelong Republican Operative and Will Rule Like One