Trump’s Attacks Against the Judiciary
Trump’s Attacks Against the Judiciary and the Rule of Law
Trump DOJ Sues Every Federal District Judge in Maryland
Trump’s Department of Justice sued every Federal District judge in Maryland to enable Trump to break the law and deport people without due process, to challenge a standing court order that protects due process rights by temporarily barring the government from deporting people after they have filed a challenge.
Trump’s DOJ Sues ALL FEDERAL JUDGES IN MARYLAND For Two-Day Pause on Deportations!
The Trump administration consistently has been violating the due process rights of immigrants by trying to deport them before they can assert their constitutional rights to notice and opportunity to be heard. To stop this abusive practice, the federal court judges in Maryland instituted a two-day pause rule after someone filed a petition with the court before they could be deported. Trump then had his Department of Justice file a lawsuit against every single federal district judge in Maryland to try to defeat the two-day pause rule.
Trump’s DOJ Sues ALL FEDERAL JUDGES IN MARYLAND For Two-Day Pause on Deportations
The Trump administration’s latest escalation in its attempt to undermine federal courts and erode due process protections the US District Court of Maryland’s order issued last month initiated an automatic two-day stay on habius corpus challenges in part to preserve the status quo and ensure petitioners are able to participate in proceedings and access legal counsel. In its complaint, the DOJ characterized the order as a particularly egregious example of judicial overreach interfering with executive branch prerogatives the DOJ claimed the standing order has prevented federal immigration authorities from enforcing immigration law actually it’s prevented immigration authorities from violating the due process rights of individuals they are snatching up. The Department of Justice asked the same court it is suing to declare the order unlawful and issue an injunction blocking the judges from enforcing it though the department filed the lawsuit in the District Court of Maryland the DOJ asked all of its judges to recuse themselves from the case and that a judge from another district hear the case all judges with the District Court of Maryland were named as defendants because they all must approve before standing court orders are issued. Defendants include Judge Paul Asinis, the judge presiding over Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s lawsuit challenging his wrongful removal from the US and imprisonment in El Salvador earlier this year legal scholars said that the DOJ’s lawsuit raises concerns over the protections judges have from lawsuits over their official acts such as issuing orders in cases. Adam Bonica, a professor of political science at Stanford, noted that the DOJ is in essence arguing that judicial review inflicts irreparable harm on the government. That the DOJ is in essence arguing that judicial review inflicts irreparable harm on the government the Trump administration.
Here’s a few sentences from the DOJ brief in the lawsuit filed against all of the Federal District Court Judges in Maryland, with a little editorializing along the way.
“In the case of the United States of America and the United States Department of Homeland Security plaintiffs against all of the federal district court judges in Maryland defendants in recent months and years district courts have used and abused their equitable powers to interfere with the prerogatives of the executive branch to an unprecedented degree. In the first 100 days of President Trump’s current term district courts have entered more nationwide injunctions than in the 100 years from 1900 to 2000”.
Why? Because in the first 100 days of Trump’s term, he has engaged in more unlawful and unconstitutional conduct than any president in the last 100 years, probably more than all presidents combined.
“This lawsuit involves yet another regrettable example of the unlawful use of equitable powers to restrain the Executive,” the complaint reads. “Specifically, Defendants have instituted an avowedly automatic injunction against the federal government, issued outside the context of any particular case or controversy, by promulgating a standing order that requires the court clerk to automatically enter an injunction against removing or changing the legal status of any alien detained in Maryland who files a habius petition”.
Essentially the federal judges in Maryland are putting in place a two-day pause because Donald Trump’s executive branch has been consistently violating the due process rights of immigrants. This is nothing more than an attempt to undermine the authority of the Federal Judiciary and to continue to be able to violate the due process rights of notice and opportunity to be heard by everyone, including immigrants.
Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement announcing the complaint that Trump’s executive authority has been undermined “since the first hours of his presidency” by scores of injunctions. “The American people elected President Trump to carry out his policy agenda: this pattern of judicial overreach undermines the democratic process and cannot be allowed to stand,” she said.
There’s evidence that the Americans People DIDN’T elected Trump and the 2024 Election was RIGGED and STOLEN, and he’s a ILLEGITIMATE President as detailed below;
How Congress Can INVALIDATE Trump 2.0
Constitutional scholar and Law Professor Evan Bernick joins Jessica Denson to describe how lawmakers could utilize Section 3 of the 14th amendment to remove Trump from office.
Constitutional Professor Evan Bernick of Northern Illinois University states in the above video:
“We have an alarming State of Affairs in which we have an ongoing constitutional violation in the form of the current head of the executive branch. I would say that members of congress are constitutionally obliged by virtue of the oath that they take to the Constitution to do anything possible within the institutional powers that they have up to an including enacting legislation that specifically puts an issue the question of whether he is constitutionally capable of holding office which he isn’t or calling for his impeachment”.
Professor Bernick stated that Trump is a constitutionally illegitimate president. Congressional Democrats should hold a press conference explaining why Trump is a constitutionally illegitimate president and initiate an Amnesty Vote to remove Trump from office. To date, DEMOCRATS have ignored his advise.
Trump Defies Judge to Deport Venezuelans to Salvadoran Slave Jail
