The 2022 Florida Gubernatorial election results were very suspicious. Democrats vote count in 2018 was 4,043,723 and in 2022 it was 3,105,469, a drop of almost 1 million votes. Hard to believe that many Democrats didn’t show up to vote.

Articles on this page details suspicious election results and investigations which show possible election rigging in Florida

 

 

It defies logic that a majority of Floridians voted to re-elect Ron DeSantis in 2022 after passing and attempting to pass some of the most harsh, restrictive laws in the United States, as shown in the list above.

It also deifies logic that Florida Amendment 4, Right to Abortion Initiative and Recreational Marijuana Amendment 3 didn’t pass in 2024. It’s well known that DeSantis and Florida Republicans didn’t want either of these to pass. Seems that what-ever Radical Right Wing Florida Republicans want, Florida Republicans get… lending credence that they’re rigging elections to maintain power no matter how the people vote, so they can cram their radical Right Wing Policies down Floridians throats.

 

A poll from The Political Matrix/Listener Group showed Charlie Crist leading Florida Ron DeSantis in the gubernatorial race as of Sep 26, 2022.

 

As pointed out by the Tampa Bay Times, “Florida’s voter turnout for Democrats was an outlier compared to the rest of the country. Statewide, nearly two-thirds of registered Republicans showed up to the polls, compared to just half of registered Democrats” according to a Tampa Bay Times analysis.

 

The huge difference in Democrats’ vote count between 2018 of 4,043,723 and 2022 of 3,105,469 (a drop of almost a million votes) is remarkable.

There’s a total 4,970,554 registered Democrats in Florida and yet Charlie Crist only received 3,105,469 votes in 2022. When you subtract 3,105,469 who voted for Crist, minus the total 4,970,554 registered Democrats in Florida, the total comes to 1,865,085 who supposedly didn’t vote for Democrat Charlie Crist. On top of that is the 4,008,962 no Party Affiliation voters. It’s reasonable to assume some of them would have voted for Crist.

 

Per Florida voter stats, the total registered Florida Voters is 14,539,989. The total votes for all Florida Gubernatorial candidates (DeSantis, Crist, Gimenez and Roos) was 7,770,109. 14,539,989 registered voters – 7,770,109 who voted = 6,769,880 who didn’t vote. It’s hard to believe that many registered voters didn’t vote.

Democrats turning out across the United States in high numbers is why the “Red Wave” didn’t happen in 2022

 

Turnout Was a Big Problem for Democrats in Major Florida Counties

Only about half of the Democrats showed up for Tuesday’s election while around two-thirds of Republicans voted.

Per an article at nbcmiami.com, “Turnout Was a Big Problem for Democrats in Major Florida Counties”

“In Miami-Dade County, there are 135,229 more registered Democrats than Republicans, but more Republicans showed up: 61% of registered Republicans voted and only 46% of Democrat registered voters”.

“There are 106,299 more registered Democrats than Republicans in Palm Beach County. 55% of registered Democrats showed up and 66% of Republicans showed up”.

“There are 53,156 more registered Democrats than Republicans in Hillsborough County but only 39% of Democrats showed up and 44% of Republicans showed up to vote”.

As reported by the Miami Herald; “The state Republican Party of Florida changed the voter registration of hundreds of low-income voters to Republican without their consent“.  This proves Florida Republicans engaged in unethical activities to affect the 2022 election outcome.

 

It defies logic that Rick Scott keeps getting ‘re-elected’ after allegations of Medicare fraud and a history of a doing for average Joe citizens, lending credence that Florida elections must be rigged.

 

 

 

Florida Preliminary Report finds Invented Ballots

 

ETA’s Nathan Taylor delivers updates on legal progress and reveals initial findings in Florida election fraud investigation.

 

More evidence has surfaced of vanishing votes in the 2024 election, further questioning Trump’s “win,” and consistent with the assessment of intelligence agencies that Russian malware could remove voters from the rolls and skew the election for their chosen candidate. Former investigative journalist Alison Greene, who covered election integrity and national intelligence issues for David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, unveils her findings, and a new movement for bold action for securing the 2026 midterms and removing the Trump regime.

 

Florida 2024 Alarming Trends

 

Election Truth Alliance Uncovers Red Flags in Florida – Nathan Taylor on the The Mark Thompson Show

 

 

She Won: Over 2 Million Votes Removed from Florida’s 2024 Election Results

A data-driven analysis of election night reporting, certified totals, and the unexplained loss of millions of votes.

Per the above article: “Over 2 Million Votes Removed from Florida’s 2024 Election Results”

While this investigation may appear data-dense, it simply tracks election totals across sources like the University of Florida Election Lab and election night reporting feeds, then compares them with certified county and state results.

Setting all data and Election Night reporting aside, please keep these points in mind:

• Election totals should not move backward; vote tabulation is an additive process.
• County, state, and national certified totals should match.

Numbers to remember:

• Certified early mail-in votes reported: 3,029,152
• Certified early in-person votes reported: 5,363,013
• Certified early mail-in and in-person votes total: 8,392,165
• Certified Election Day turnout total: 2,579,590
• Certified cumulative vote total: 11,004,209
• VP Harris certified early and Election Day totals: 4,683,038
• Trump certified early and Election Day totals: 6,110,125

Note: The University of Florida Election Lab is a widely cited, nonpartisan source for tracking early voting and turnout data in U.S. elections. Its datasets have been relied on for years by journalists, researchers, campaigns, and election officials to analyze near real-time voting patterns—particularly in high-stakes states like Florida—and are frequently used to validate turnout trends and early vote totals.

On the morning of Election Day, the University of Florida’s Election Lab reported that 9,137,249 early votes had been cast in the state of Florida for the 2024 General Election.

 

However, in the same view on the same webpage, the report also listed totals for mail ballots returned and in-person early votes that combined to only 8,288,885:

• In-Person Early Votes: 5,363,879
• Mail Ballots Returned: 2,925,006

The Total Early Votes of 9,137,249 results in a discrepancy of 848,364 votes within the University of Florida report itself.

Likewise, in the State of Florida’s official Early Vote Status Report, released nearly a month later on December 2, 2024, total early voting turnout (mail-in and in-person) was reported as 8,392,165.

9,137,249 – 8,392,165 = 745,084 missing votes between November 5, 2024, and December 2, 2024.

The state’s December 2 total of 8,392,165 is 103,280 higher than the University of Florida Election Lab’s combined early vote categories, yet still 745,084 fewer than its reported total of 9,137,249.

 

The Legalities

Under Florida law, all returns released by counties between 7:00 and 8:00 PM ET must reflect early votes only—mail-in and early in-person ballots. No Election Day votes are permitted to be reported before 8:00 PM.

Therefore, all Florida tallies reported before 8:00 PM reflect only early voting.

On Election Night at 7:53 PM ET, The New York Times—using data supplied by the AP VoteCast reporting service—was one of several outlets (including CNN and Orlando’s News 6) reporting early vote totals in Florida that exceeded the state’s official early voting turnout.

 

At 7:53 PM ET, The New York Times report was within the window restricted by state law, meaning that only early votes were being reported.

• Kamala Harris had received 4,021,649 early votes
• Donald Trump had received 4,990,405

Combined total: 9,012,054 early votes, with only 80% reporting.

Remember: the state certified total of early votes is 8,392,165, meaning the AP/NYT total is 619,889 higher than the certified total with another 20% unreported.

The below New York Times Election Night reporting states that the early votes for Harris and Trump, combined, totaled 9,012,054, which is 125,195 less than the University of Florida’s 9,137,249 total of early votes.

But it is 619,889 MORE than the state’s official report of early voting turnout.

 

Then add 329,383 additional early votes attributed to panhandle counties that reported their early vote totals between 8-8:30 PM ET

9,012,054 + 329,383 = 9,341,437 early votes in Florida, as reported by AP/NYT.

9,341,437 – 8,392,165 (state certified total): 949,272 more than the state certified total of early votes.

Further, if Harris earned 4,021,649 early votes, as reported by the AP/New York Times, then she would only be able to earn 661,389 “Election Day” votes to meet her state certified total of 4,683,038.

 

And yet, a review of county-certified results across Florida found that, in just 19 of the state’s 67 counties, Vice President Harris received 703,010 Election Day votes.

Adding those Election Day votes to the AP/NYT data brings her total to 4,724,659—already exceeding her state-certified total of 4,683,038.

There are 48 remaining counties to add to this number.

Note: The Department of State’s certified cumulative vote total is 11,004,209; however, data extracted on January 25, 2025, from all 67 counties shows a statewide turnout of 11,045,922.

11,045,922 – 11,004,209 = 41,713 missing votes between the county-certified totals and the state-certified total.

Based on these comparisons of county-certified results, the final certified state totals for VP Harris and candidate Trump cannot be reconciled with the Election Night reporting of early vote totals.

 

Edit: On the day of publication, the data on Wikipedia was altered to remove the 41,713-vote difference and make the totals match. Thankfully, we calculated the totals ourselves and preserved a screenshot of the previously reported total.

As shown in the above graph, additional news sources also reported early vote totals exceeding certified turnout:

• Edison data used by CNN showed 8,446,177 early votes
• Edison data used by Orlando News 6 reported 8,782,543
• The New York Times, using AP data, reported 9,012,054

Tracking the progression of votes on both the Edison data feed and the DDHQ data feed, the comparison reveals that the Edison data feed—used by CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, and NBC—lost more than 2.6 million votes throughout the course of the evening.

Simple human errors—such as inputting an incorrect total—cannot explain multiple instances of tally decreases. In some cases, these decreases were witnessed on the very same broadcast; in others, they appeared across different livestreams drawing from the same data feed.

Media outlets all received election night reporting data from the same sources during the 2024 election. As members of the National Election Pool, they were provided “real-time” election data through a private firm, Edison Research (later acquired by SSRS in 2025). Two additional providers—Associated Press and Decision Desk HQ—also supplied election night data feeds to news organizations.

Because these outlets were receiving results from shared sources in real time, their reported totals should align closely. When one member of the National Election Pool shows a significant decrease in candidate totals at a later point in time, it should raise a red flag.

When tallies decrease repeatedly—and across multiple outlets—it suggests a systemic issue. Specifically, it indicates that the underlying data feeding these election night reporting systems was manipulated.

 

At 7:44 PM ET, CNN’s Edison reported a combined total of 8,446,177 votes, while Brian Tyler Cohen’s DDHQ feed showed 6,550,571—nearly 2 million fewer votes.

Again, keep in mind that voting is an additive process, and the Edison feed started the evening with nearly 2 million more votes than the DDHQ feed.

At 7:56 PM ET, the Edison feed total reduces from 8,782,543 to 7,721,344. Trump’s total dropped by 649,354 votes and VP Harris’s by 411,845 votes, for a loss of 1,061,199 votes.

 

Subsequent vote losses, at 8:41 PM ET and 8:57 PM ET in the Edison feed make the entire vote loss more than 2.6 million votes.

Over 2.6 million votes. Poof. Gone.

Adding the data in the Edison feed without subtracting any of the “losses” brings the cumulative total to 13,431,362 votes, versus the state certified total of 10,793,163 votes for VP Harris and candidate Trump.

13,431,362 – 10,793,163 = 2,638,199 votes removed from the Edison reporting system.

Based on this data progression, it is apparent that the system of record was manipulated after tabulation to produce artificial outcomes in the presidential race.

 

 

Pre-Electronic Voting records from 1984 Shows Evidence of Manipulation Favoring Republicans Since 2016 in Electronic Vote Counting Computers

 

 

 

RedShift: How The GOP Rigged Our Elections

Writer and author Thom Hartman discusses how Republicans have been rigging elections for the past 50 years and how exit polls in states like Florida showed Hillary Clinton winning the 2016 election.

 

Dr Beth Clarkson, a ASQ-Certified Quality Engineer with a PhD in Statistics, stated she found patterns indicative of manipulation in elections and voting machines; “not just an anomaly that occurred in one place, but a pattern that has occurred repeatedly in elections across the U.S.”

This may explain why Democrats haven’t been winning more elections and why Republicans keep getting re-elected in Red States like Florida & Texas, after passing harsh, anti-abortion laws, while doing nothing for average Joe Americans.

 

NSA Analyst Proves GOP Is Stealing Elections

Analysis of recent election data has revealed a worrying pattern of potential fraud. In states where the margin of victory is less than 10%, the same mathematical formula has been found to consistently result in votes being flipped from Democrat to Republican. This has been the case in federal, senatorial, congressional and gubernatorial elections since 2008, and in the 2012 primary contests from other Republicans to Mitt Romney.

The five major voting machine companies have all been found to have close financial ties to the GOP, raising questions of conflict of interest. Tagg Romney, son of the former presidential candidate, has denied any such conflict, despite his investment in Hart Intercivic and Diebold.

A retired NSA analyst has applied a simple formula to election results in Arizona, and found evidence of systemic and coordinated election fraud on a large scale. However, this appears to be limited to larger precincts, as anomalies in smaller precincts are more easily detected.

“Easy to Cheat”

Michael Duniho, a retired NSA analyst, has spent the past seven years investigating voting anomalies in his home state of Arizona and Pima County. His research has focused on a 2006 RTA Bond issue election, which has been subject to much discussion in the media. According to Duniho, “It is really easy to cheat using computers to count votes, since you can’t see what is going on in the machine.”

Duniho applied a mathematical model to the voting results from the largest precincts in Arizona and found that the Republican candidate in every election since 2008 had gained 8-10% in the polls, while the Democratic candidate had lost 8-10%. This swing of up to 20 points could be enough to swing an election, unless the candidate was already losing badly.

Duniho, with decades of experience in deciphering large amounts of data for the NSA, was determined to understand why this pattern was only occurring in the largest precincts.

Nose Counting

Francois Choquette and James Johnson have uncovered an intriguing phenomenon in the February Republican primary contest in South Carolina. An unusually large number of votes were cast for Mitt Romney in larger precincts, while Paul and Santorum votes trended downward. This prompted Choquette to examine the results in all 50 states, where he found a 10% switch in votes from Democrat to GOP in all states except Utah. Further investigation revealed that Romney had used the same technique against John McCain in Maricopa County in 2008, although McCain’s lead was too large to be affected.

Given the sheer scale of the task, Choquette has provided a set of instructions to enable others to replicate the analysis in their own county or state. The implications of this research could be far-reaching and Choquette’s work is certainly worthy of further examination.

Stealing Votes

Analysis of voting patterns in Arizona has revealed a significant discrepancy between the size of precincts and the results of the election. According to Professor Duniho, if the percentages of votes remained consistent between precincts, the trend line would be flat. However, the reality is that the lines slope downwards for Democrats and upwards for Republicans. This phenomenon is particularly evident in the 2012 Presidential primary, where votes for Rick Santorum and Ron Paul were systematically bled off and credited to Mitt Romney. After Duniho’s spreadsheet was completed, the actual vote totals from other Arizona election contests were compared, further confirming the discrepancy.

Analysis of the 2010 elections in Arizona has revealed evidence of manipulation. From Governor Brewer to Senator McCain and Congresswoman Gabby Giffords, the trends lines all indicated that a single individual had inserted a program into the system’s central computer, flipping votes. The results were astonishing: Governor Brewer had actually lost her election and Gabby Gifford’s slim victory over Tea Party Conservative Jesse Kelly was much greater than the reported 1%.

John Duniho, a political analyst, has called for strong hand count audits to confirm the integrity of the elections. This would involve comparing hand counts to the official reports. Such measures are essential to ensure the legitimacy of the electoral process.

Ohio Precedent

For years, Republicans have been accused of vote tampering in elections. In 2004, the presidential election in Ohio and Florida brought these allegations to the forefront. In Ohio, GOP consultant Michael Connell was accused of creating a computer program with a trap door that shifted Democratic votes to the Republican Party. Connell was subpoenaed as a witness in a lawsuit against then-Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, and lawyers for the plaintiff asked the Department of Justice to provide Connell with security due to two threats made against his life by people associated with Karl Rove. Tragically, Connell was killed in a plane crash before the trial began.

In Florida, the University of California at Berkeley’s Quantitative Methods Research Team conducted a study that found anomalies between Florida counties using touch-screen voting and those using other methods that could not be explained statistically. The study showed that counties using electronic voting resulted in a disproportionate increase in votes for President Bush. Michael Hout, a Berkeley professor who conducted the study, said that the evidence was too strong to ignore, noting that the probability of such evidence occurring where the true difference is zero is less than once in a thousand chances.

Don’t Trust, Verify

The integrity of the upcoming US election is under scrutiny after an analysis by statistician Richard Duniho found evidence of vote-flipping. This could only be possible if computerized voting machines were programmed to steal votes. Calls to conduct hand counts of ballots by precinct to verify the results have been unsuccessful in Pima County, Arizona, where anomalies were first detected in 2006. With the election just 12 days away, it is unclear whether a judge will be willing to reverse past trends and permit access to ballots.

The implications of this are concerning. More than 100 million Americans will cast their ballots, believing their vote will be fairly counted. If the analysis is correct, criminals could be stealing up to 10% of votes without consequence. This could have a significant impact on the outcome of the election, which is much closer than in 2008 when President Obama won by a large margin. It is essential that the American democratic system is not undermined by another election crisis, raising questions over the last three national Presidential election results.

Don’t Take Our Word

As the US election results continue to pour in, the need for accuracy and transparency has never been greater. In the UK, paper ballots are used and the final outcome can take up to three days to be finalized. This is because every ballot is transparently hand-counted, providing citizens with the assurance that their votes are counted accurately.

The Justice Department’s insistence that results must be reported by 11 pm for the television networks is not only misguided, but irresponsible. It is time for Americans to demand hand ballot counts, and to reject the notion of being victimized by vote fraud. The news that Serbia, Belarus and Kazakhstan are sending election monitors to watch the US election is a stark reminder of the need for accuracy and transparency in this process. It is time for Americans to take control of their own destiny and ensure that their votes are counted accurately.

 

Note how this voting machine is rigged for Mitt Romney in 2012

 

In 2004 a computer programmer by the name of Clint Curtis testified to a congressional committee that he wrote a program for Florida Republican Tom Feeney, who was Speaker of the House at the time (per the video link below) which could flip votes and be undetectable. This shows Republicans’ history of efforts to rig / flip elections so it would be undetectable, going back 20 years.

When you consider how much technology has advanced in over 20 years, how Florida Republicans has done everything possible to suppress those who might vote for Democrats, the ruthless one party rule of Florida Republicans and the unusual low vote count of Democrats in Florida (called an ‘outlier’ by the Tampa Bay Times), it’s reasonable to question the outcome of the 2022 Florida Gubernatorial Race.

 

Full testimony of veteran computer programmer Clint Curtis, at a U.S. Congressional Hearing in 2004 about being contacted by a Florida Republican to rig elections